Trump's former Chief Strategist, Steve Bannon, calls for a full probe on members of mainstream media, particularly Rachel Maddow and MSNBC, in their "monthslong" investigation of Lev Parnas.
The interview with Bannon and Trish Regan suggests there was some sort of collusion between members of the Democratic Party and mainstream media regarding Lev Parnas.
Bannon even thinks that Maddow could be a fact witness.
Here's a video clip from the interview.
As posted by Zero Hedge:
"We ought to have all the emails and all the text messages between Schiff, between Nancy Pelosi, Phil Griffin at MSNBC News. We ought to bring the whole thing out. How did this get dropped? Why have they been working on this for so long? How did this just come about at the last second? She admitted she's been working on this for months, and the House just got this. The Republicans didn't even see this when the vote when down," said Bannon, adding "This is now a complete farce."
"I think there was collusion between MSNBC, Rachel Maddow, Lev Parnas's attorneys, and the entire process." -Steve Bannon
"So why did this not come forward earlier?" asks Regan.
"You know why, because they wanted to drop their "big reveal," this was going be such a big bombshell. This is all total hearsay from a guy trying to talk his way into a lesser sentence because he's already indicted. It's so obvious what he's trying to do."
*** 24% off Patriotic Face Masks - Get One Now! ***
Adding to the collusion / 'slow walk' theory is the completion of a report by the Government Accountability Office (GAO) requested by Democratic Senator Chris Van Hollen, which found that President Trump's pause of US aid to Ukraine violated the law. Of note, virtually every previous administration has received a similar nastygram from the GAO - just not the day after directly related impeachment articles were delivered to the Senate ahead of a trial.
Is there verifiable proof that members of the Democratic Party were working with the leftist mainstream media? We can speculate, of course, but would need concrete evidence such as emails or text messages to make it a FACT that can't be ignored.