Klobuchar asked about why she prosecuted black teenager despite lack of evidence
Close Ad & Play Video
Amy Klobuchar faced criticism when she prosecuted a black teenager despite a lack of evidence. The "surveillance tape was not presented, no DNA, no gun, alibi witnesses not talked to, no fingerprints" - but he was still prosecuted. ABC News’ Martha Raddatz wants to know why.
The back-and-forth between Hostin and Klobuchar, the former top prosecutor in Minneapolis, concerned an Associated Press investigation into the case of Myon Burrell. Burrell was 16 when he was apprehended in the 2002 death of an 11-year-old African American girl, killed by a stray bullet while doing her homework.
No gun, fingerprints or DNA were ever recovered, and the case against Burrell relied on the testimony of a teen rival who offered conflicting stories when identifying the trigger man, who was standing 120 feet away, mostly behind a wall, the AP reported.
The AP also uncovered questionable police tactics in the case, including an investigator who offered cash for information, and interviewed a prison inmate who said that he was the triggerman and that Burrell was not on the scene when Tyesha Edwards was shot and killed.
Klobuchar, whose office prosecuted the case, has raised the case throughout her political career — even during her 2020 presidential campaign — as an example of how she helped find justice for victims of violence. (Mercury News)
Is Vote By Mail easy to cheat?
Probably doesn't even matter to him
Calling all patriots, this book is for you!