Schiff claims there was quid pro quo

This is Adam Schiff saying that Sondland confirms quid pro quo, despite what witnesses were saying about there being no quid pro quo.  Schiff said this on Twitter, "Sondland confirms that the Ukraine scheme was a quid pro quo: the conditioning of official acts, a WH meeting and military aid, for something of great value to the president. It goes right to the heart of the issue of bribery, and other potential high crimes and misdemeanors."  However, that contradicts what witnesses said to people like Stefanik.


If Schiff is talking about Sondland making donations to Trump's inauguration, then yes, but that is not what this impeachment hearing is about, nor does it have anything to do with the impeachment hearing or the alleged quid pro quo with Ukraine.


This is why I don't trust Adam Schiff. There are other videos from the same hearing that show witnesses stating there is no quid pro quo, but Schiff says the exact opposite.


Trump Winter Beanies are Running Out Get yours FREE!
(just cover shipping)

Should we impeach Ilhan Omar? Yes or No? / Is AOC mentally unstable? Sign off on it! / Should we demand Adam Schiff resign? Add your name!

Follow us on Facebook | Follow us on Twitter